From RAS Sizing to RAS Cost: The Workflow
The exact order to work in: production target, standing biomass, feed load, flow and filtration, then cost. Skipping a step is what makes quotes incomparable.
Part 2 of the RAS cost and sizing series. RAS sizing and RAS system cost are the same exercise run in sequence. Cost estimates produced before sizing are benchmarks applied to a guess; estimates produced after sizing are budgets. The tools below follow the sequence exactly.
Step 1 — Production target to standing biomass
Annual tonnes, harvest weight, cycle length, survival and FCR give peak standing biomass. Use the biomass calculator if the growth model is not fixed yet.
Step 2 — Standing biomass to feed load
Daily feed at peak biomass is the master variable behind oxygen demand, TAN production and solids load. Roughly 30 g of TAN per kg of 32% protein feed, and 0.4-0.6 kg of oxygen per kg of feed, are the planning constants.
Step 3 — Feed load to flow, filtration and oxygen
Density limits give tank volume; turnover rate of 0.75-1.5 volumes per hour gives recirculation flow. Run it in the RAS sizing calculator and check reuse assumptions with the RAS water turnover calculator.
Step 4 — Sized scope to cost
Only now does a cost estimate mean anything. Price the resulting scope in the RAS system cost calculator, then test the result against your farm-gate price in the RAS feasibility calculator.
Step 5 — Cost to comparable bids
Suppliers quote different scope boundaries. Normalise them against the sized packages with the RAS bid normalizer before comparing headline prices.
The whole path, with checklists, sits in the RAS planning hub. When the numbers are ready, a human-reviewed RFQ turns them into a procurement-ready brief.
Where this fits in a real project
Every FishMatch project runs through the same five reviewed stages, from a first enquiry to comparable quotations. See the full buyer journey.