水產養殖市場指南
台灣養殖場成本計算器
以當地價格估算台灣魚蝦養殖場的資本支出、飼料與能源成本。結果以當地貨幣與美元顯示。
採用匯率: 1 USD ≈ 31 TWD
預估結果
- 設備與安裝資本支出
- $69,750,000 · US$2,250,000 – $108,500,000 · US$3,500,000
- 所需飼料
- 350 t/年
- 飼料成本
- $15,190,000 · US$490,000/年
- 能源成本
- $8,788,500 · US$283,500/年
- 水費（RAS 補水）
- $4,650,000 · US$150,000/年
- 設備營業稅 (5%)
- $3,487,500 · US$112,500 – $5,425,000 · US$175,000
- RAS 水體積
- 2,083 m³
依 2026 年區域範圍與概略匯率所作之預估，並非報價。
電價：GlobalPetrolPrices 商業電價（2026）。水價與匯率為估計值；稅率為全國標準稅率。
常見問題
在台灣建造養殖場要多少錢？
在台灣，年產 250 噸的 RAS 設備與安裝約需 $6975萬 (≈ US$225萬) – $1.1億 (≈ US$350萬)，不含土地與建物。魚塭與網箱每噸成本通常較低。請使用計算器後再申請供應商報價。
台灣養殖哪些魚蝦？
台灣的商業專案主要聚焦於白蝦, 吳郭魚, 金目鱸, 鯛魚。
本頁其他語言版本
Before you request quotes
Costs & budgeting
How much does a commercial fish farm cost to build?
Budget ranges depend on system type, not on country alone. Pond and cage projects are usually the lowest capital per tonne of annual output, while recirculating (RAS) projects carry the highest equipment and energy share because filtration, oxygenation and backup power are mandatory. Reliable numbers come from a sized bill of quantities — species, target tonnage, water source and grow-out temperature — not from a generic price list. Use the FishMatch calculators to size the project, then submit an RFQ so quotes are priced against the same specification.
What drives the price differences between aquaculture equipment quotes?
Most spread between quotes comes from scope, not from margin: included spares, installation and commissioning, control and automation level, materials (HDPE vs steel vs FRP), certification and testing, delivery terms (EXW vs CIF) and warranty length. Two quotes are only comparable when they answer the same specification. A structured RFQ fixes the scope so differences reflect real engineering choices.
What operating costs should a business plan include?
Feed is normally the largest recurring cost, followed by energy (highest in RAS), labour, fingerlings or post-larvae, health management, water treatment consumables and maintenance. Financing cost and working capital for the first production cycle are frequently underestimated. FishMatch cost tools separate CAPEX from OPEX so the payback assumption is visible rather than implied.